“Fuck The Troops II: Some People Push Back” from RAIM

A poster from RAIL (now defunct); it's still relevant!

Also from RAIM-D:  The original “Fuck the Troops”.

White settler admits crimes of his parasite class against the Azanian nation

White settler admits crimes of his parasite class against the Azanian nation

By Jacob Brown

Klanada’s Globe and Mail’s Sept. 17 article reads:

Brandon Huntley, a white South African who had overstayed his Canadian work permit, applied for refugee status on the grounds that should he return home, he would be persecuted by black South Africans. He was granted refugee status by an immigration board panel in Ottawa last week. The Canadian tribunal chair ruled that there was “clear and convincing proof of the state’s inability or unwillingness to protect him,” adding: “I find that the claimant would stand out like a ‘sore thumb’ due to his colour in any part of the country.”

The South African government decried the decision as racist, since it was based on the assumption that white people are singled out for persecution in what one Tweeter called an “imaginary pogrom.”

Here’s the kicker:

Mr. Huntley acknowledged that he never pursued charges related to the alleged attacks. “There’s a hatred of what we did to them and it’s all about the colour of your skin,” he told the tribunal.

Who said there wasn’t a parasite who could tell the truth?  In fact, this settler scum is telling more truth about the situation in Azania than the lackey “African National Congress” (ANC) government.  As of 2007, 90% of Azanian land remains captive in white settlers’ thieving clutches.  Does the ass-kissing ANC honestly believe the masses will continue to tolerate their so-called “snail’s pace” to land reform after a full fifteen years of virtually nothing while in power?  The ANC’s once glorious legacy of resistance to white settlerism is being further tarnished as they continue to sell out.  The exploited and oppressed of the Azanian nation are now openly calling for the radical redistribution of their stolen land back to them, their rightful national owners, which is far above and beyond what the lame ANC is willing to lead on.

To achieve this end, we Maoist-Third Worldists call for the JDPEN (2) to be implemented.  This, as opposed to the comprador ANC approach, will give whitey something to really cry about.  But hey, at least it’s a step lighter (3) than “One Settler, One Bullet!” slogan (4) advanced in the 1980’s and early 1990’s, a fortunate situation for these otherwise bullet-deserving parasite scum.

The article continues on to demonstrate the incompetence of the ANC “integrationist” social-democrats:

But there is a story of another type of desperation, this one very real, that has not made the headlines or front pages of international newspapers: The suicide death of 22-year-old Skhumbuzo Douglas Mhlongo in Durban.

According to the Johannesburg newspaper Business Day, Mr. Mhlongo was a part-time employee at a pet-food factory. He was offered a full-time position that he could not start until he got his identity document. The Department of Home Affairs, which issues IDs, sent him from pillar to post. In South Africa, you don’t exist without this document. You’re not a citizen in your own country.

Poor people struggle to obtain IDs and the costs incurred to get them are prohibitively expensive – especially for Mr. Mhlongo, who borrowed heavily to finance his living expenses and then to pay for travelling to and from the Home Affairs department’s offices. Mr. Mhlongo reportedly killed himself after an official tore up his application because he was not convinced that he was indeed South African and not a makwerekwere , as foreign nationals are pejoratively called.

Who, in these two tales, is the threatened minority? The privileged white émigré with recourse to plane tickets and immigration lawyers? Or the poor black factory worker who, shunned by his own government and unable to get citizenship in his own country, saw death as his only escape?

Any serious class analysis would show that the disgusting apartheid regime (5) still exists de facto, even with the “AN”C in power.  Similar “power sharing” class collaborationist alliances (6) by “revolutionaries” in Africa, Asia, and Latin America have led to utter disaster for the overwhelming majority while retaining the privilege of the few.  This is the classic historical shell game of paleo-colonialism to neo-colonialism; phony “national independence”.   For a Maoist-Third Worldist party leading a JDPEN nation, fifteen years in power means a grand total of three “Five Year Plans” (7) to 1.) Collectivize agriculture, 2.) Industrialize, 3.) Wage Cultural Revolution.  You see?  Fifteen years of liberation for a Maoist-Third Worldist means GREAT STRIDES can be made towards revolutionizing the base and superstructure under a genuine socialist dictatorship of the proletariat.  Under JDPEN-style socialism Mr. Mhlongo would be alive, working, and thriving as well as leading and liberating humanity; while Mr. Huntley (the real makwerekwere here) would be doing “involuntary charity work” to help Mr. Mhlongo and other fellow Third World proletarians STAY living, thriving, and pressing toward a communist future.

The ANC government should “speak for itself” when it talks of Azania being safe for white privilege.  Can anyone blame KKKlanada, another parasite settler nation, for taking in one of their own?

See also:  Settler hypocrisy in Zimbabwe at MSH

Notes:

1. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/two-men-two-countries-two-minorities/article1273775
2. “Joint Dictatorship of the Proletariat of the Exploited Nations”
3. http://jacobinternationalism.wordpress.com/2009/09/12/maoism-third-worldism-on-the-death-penalty-under-jdpen-part-1
4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Settler,_One_Bullet
5. http://faculty.mdc.edu/jmcnair/Joe8pages/history_of_apartheid_in_south_af.htm
6. That is, making friends out of lackeys and reactionaries as opposed to progressive/patriotic class forces in a “New Democracy” situation.
7. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five-Year_Plans_of_China (Particular focus for the purposes of this article are the first three Five Year Plans in the People’s Republic of China, the period spanning 1953-1970, while the basic thrust of the PRC was still socialist.)

Maoism-Third Worldism on the Death Penalty under JDPEN: On the original ‘Plan de San Diego’ in a contemporary context

This article is in part a response to a comment by Serve the People in the JDPEN Outline post.  The comment reads:

Comrade, I agree that things were not perfect in occupied eastern Germoney. I’m not convinced that that part of Germoney ever quite made it to socialism. On the other hand, proletarianizing that fascist population was a task of monumental proportions. I don’t believe that it could have been achieved in the short few years before the Soviet Union itself went revisionist. Proletarianizing a thoroughly reactionary population like Germoney or Amerikkka may take several generations.

I’m not quite sure what you mean by a Soviet version of the Plans of San Diego. Are you saying that the Soviet Red Army should have killed off all Germans?

The short answer is NO.  The same goes for the JDPEN’s settling of accounts with the other First World parasite majority populations.  Just imagine the shit fit we communists would be getting into if we were ever to advocate mass killings of any group of humans, oppressors and net exploiters included!  Fortunately, communists (Maoist-Third Worldists) are humanitarians in the fullest sense.  We do not, and I repeat, DO NOT believe in the democide of the class enemy, whether during initial revolution or JDPEN, because we insist on acting in a scientific and strategic way as we move towards communism rather than acting on vengeful bloodlusts.  This in opposition to fake “Maoists” calling reparations, GPW, and JDPEN as manifestations of the “revenge line”, which they do to backhandedly deny the principal contradiction between First World and Third World.

The anti-communist academics (1) like to point out the grim fates of those “Enemies of the People”  under Stalin and Mao as evidence of this so-called “inherent bloodlust” among the communists and their leadership.  Their bourgeois-idealist accounts leave out all the material facts and contradictions of that period and read as though no world existed outside of these so-called “totalitarian” socialist states, the Soviet Union (pre-1950’s) and China (early 70’s).  The actual historical record disputes their “scholarly” accounts.  Comrade Stalin wrote ‘Dizzy With Success’ (2) to put the breaks on excesses taking place in the struggle for the Soviet Union’s agriculture collectivization in the 1930’s.  Stalin also had Nikolai Yezhov (head of the NKVD) shot for executing and imprisoning many innocent people in the late 1930’s.

Comrade Mao explains in ‘Ten Major Relationships’ (3) under the eighth “major relationship” point (ref. as “MR8″) not only the ethical and security issues around executions but also the science behind it.  KKKasama omits large portions of MR8 and follows up with a liberal, idealist discussion of the “horrific” exercise of proletarian state power, borrowing very much from the paradigm and methods of the anti-communist academics mentioned above!  In contrast,  the full context of what Mao said in MR8 says that communists should always be vigilant against counter-revolutionaries, and some of the worst enemies of the people will most certainly be executed.  However, Comrade Mao puts forward the notion that enemies can be reformed into “new people”, and that the policy of reform of class enemies through labor be the general policy as opposed to executions.

Observe Mao’s analysis of the eighth “Major Relationship” in full context here:

8.- The relationship between revolutionary and counter-revolutionary

What kind of element is a counter-revolutionary element? It is a
negative element, a destructive element. It is not a positive element.
It is a force opposed to positive elements.

Can a negative element turn into a positive element? Can a destructive
element turn into a beneficial element? Can a counter-revolutionary
change? This depends on social conditions.

Completely stubborn, dyed-in-the-wool counter-revolutionaries
undoubtedly exist. But where the majority of them are concerned, given
our social conditions, the day may come when they do change. Of course,
there are some who will not have time to change before they are summoned
by the King of Hell. And, as for some others, who knows when they will
change?

Because of the people's strength, and because of our correct policy
towards counter-revolutionary elements of allowing them to reform
themselves through labor and become new people, there have been many
counter-revolutionaries who have given up being counter-revolutionary.
They have taken part in agricultural and industrial labor; some of them
have become very active and done useful work.

There are a number of points about the work of suppressing counter-
revolution which need affirmation. For instance, should we have carried
out the suppression of counter-revolution of 1951-52? It seems that some
hold that we should not have carried this out. This view is wrong. It
must be recognized that this campaign was necessary.

The methods of handling counter-revolutionaries are execution,
imprisonment, probation and release. Everybody knows what execution is.
Imprisonment means locking people up and allowing them to reform
themselves through labour. Probation means placing them in society to be
supervised and remoulded by the masses. Release means not arresting
those who might or might not be arrested, or releasing those who behave
well after arrest. It is altogether right that we give different kinds
of counter-revolutionary elements different treatment according to
circumstances. These methods all need to be explained carefully to the
common people.

Whom have we executed? What sort of people? Elements for whom the masses
had great hatred, and whose blood-debt was heavy. In a great revolution
of 600 million people, if we did not kill some tyrants, or if we were
too lenient to them, the masses would not agree. It is still of
practical significance to affirm that it was correct to execute these
people. Not to give that affirmation would be bad. This is the first
point.

The second point needing affirmation is that counter-revolutionary
elements still exist in society, though there are now far fewer of them.
Our social discipline is very good, but we still should not relax our
vigilance. To say that not one counter-revolutionary remains and then
sit back and take things easy would be wrong. There is still a small
number of counter-revolutionaries carrying out sabotage; for example,
killing cattle, burning grain, wrecking factories, stealing information,
peddling counter-revolutionary slogans, etc.

In future, in suppressing counter-revolution in our society we must make
fewer arrests and carry out fewer executions.

We should hand the majority of counter-revolutionaries over to the
agricultural cooperatives so that they may participate in productive
work under supervision, and be transformed through labor. But we should
not declare that we shall never execute anyone. We cannot abolish the
death penalty. If a counter-revolutionary were to commit murder or to
blow up a factory, do you think he should be executed? He most
definitely should.

The third point which should be affirmed concerns the work of
suppressing counter-revolutionaries in government offices, schools and
the army. We must keep up the policy which we started in Yenan: "No
executions and few arrests". There are some whom we do not execute, not
because they have done nothing to deserve death, but because killing
them would bring no advantage, whereas sparing their lives would. What
harm is there in not executing people? Those amenable to labor reform
should go and do labor reform, so that rubbish can be transformed in
something useful. Besides, people's heads are not like leeks. When you
cut them off, they will not grow again. If you cut off a head wrongly,
there is no way of rectifying the mistake even if you want to.

If government departments were to adopt a policy of no executions in
their work of suppressing counter-revolutionaries, this still would not
prevent us from taking counter-revolution seriously. Moreover it would
ensure that we would not make mistakes, or if we did they could be
corrected. This would calm many people. If we do not execute people, we
must feed them. So we should give all counter-revolutionaries way out of
their impasse. This will be helpful to the people's cause and to our
image abroad.

The suppression of counter-revolution still requires a long period of
hard work. None of us may relax our efforts.

IJC sees no reason why Comrade Mao’s  observation cannot apply today, even when dealing with Amerikkkan counter-revolutionary “mASSes”.  These anti-communist academics always claim that Comrade Stalin’s call to “liquidate the kulaks as a class” was about democide.  Wrong.  Stalin was talking about liquidating CLASSES, not physical human beings as a matter of policy.  This is not to say violations of human rights and other excesses never occurred under proletarian watch, but the key to the goals of the communists is the abolition of classes not “Kill all the white people and then we’ll be free” or such simplistic vengeful nonsense, however deserving Amerikkkans might be. Naturally, it follows that some classes, namely the exploiter and oppressor classes, will disappear before the exploited and oppressed classes disappear in the course of losing their privileges in the socialist regime (the JDPEN) that precedes totally classless,  global communism.  It also follows that the role of revolutionary violence is an unpleasant, unfortunate necessity.  (With regards the new bourgeoisie that inevitably arises under any socialist regime, that class of sellouts will also disappear well before the proletariat and peasantry do, to be followed by the withering away of all class distinctions globally.)

The longer answer would be to go point by point through the original ‘Plan de San Diego’ applying the method used by Comrade Mao in MR8, as well as a contemporary Maoist-Third Worldist analysis on various points.  We will demonstrate that the original ‘Plan de San Diego’ is a document whose literal prescriptions (especially the no quarter policy) have largely passed their relevant time.  We will do this while keeping in mind that Amerikkkans are no less guilty today of benefiting from imperialist war and plunder that kills millions globally every year than in the decades surrounding 1915, when lynchings of exploited and oppressed peoples (Mexicanos, the First Nations, the Black Nation and the Asian Nations) were happening on a daily basis by Amerikkkan hands.  Add to this the birth of u.$. Imperialism (in the Leninist sense) with the occupation of the Philippines and Cuba after the $panish-Amerikkkan War.  Here are the original 15 points of ‘El Plan de San Diego’ grouped by relevant subject matter:

1. On the 20th day of February, 1915, at 2 o’clock in the morning, we will rise in arms against the Government and country of the united States and North America, on as all and all as one, proclaiming the liberty of the individuals of the black race and its independence and segregation of the States bordering on the Mexican nation, which are: Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, and Upper California, of which States the Republic of Mexico was robbed in a most perfidious manner by North American imperialism.

Genuine anti-imperialists uphold the proclamation of this first point in the main.

2. In order to render the foregoing clause effective, the necessary army corps will be formed under the immediate command of military leaders named by the supreme revolutionary congress of San Diego, Texas, which shall have full power to designate a supreme chief who shall be at the head of said army. The banner which shall guide us in this enterprise shall be red, with a white diagonal fringe, and bearing the following inscription: “Equality and Independence,” and none of the subordinate leaders or subalterns shall use any other flag (except only the white for signals.) The aforesaid army shall be known by the name of “Liberating Army for Races and Peoples.”

3. Each one of the chiefs will do his utmost by whatever means possible, to get possession of the arms and funds of the cities which he has beforehand been designated to capture in order that our cause may be provided with resources to continue the fight with better success, the said leaders each being required to render an account of everything to his superiors, in order that the latter may dispose of it in the proper manner.

4. The leader who may take a city must immediately name and appoint municipal authorities, in order that they may preserve order and assist in every way possible the revolutionary movement. In case the capital of any State which we are endeavoring to liberate be captured, there will be named in the same manner superior municipal authorities for the same purpose.

9. All appointments and grades in our army which are exercised by subordinate officers (subalterns) shall be examined (recognized) by the superior officers. There shall likewise be recognized the grades of leaders of other comlplots which may not be connected with this, and who may wise to co-operate with us – also those who may affiliate with us later.

12. None of the leaders shall have the power to make terms with the enemy without first communicating with the superior officers of the army, bearing in mind that this is a war without quarter, nor shall any leader enroll in his ranks any stranger unless said stranger belongs to the Latin, the Negro, or the Japanese race.

13. It is understood that none of the members of this complit (or anyone who may come in later) shall upon the definite triumph of the cause which we defend, fail to recognize their superiors, nor shall they aid others who with bastard designs may endeavor to destroy what has been accomplished with such great work.

14. As soon as possible each local society (junta) shall nominate delegates, who shall meet at a time and place beforehand designated, for the purpose of nominating a permanent directorate of the revolutionary movement. At this meeting shall be determined and worked out in detail the power and duties of the permanent directorate, and this revolutionary plan may be revised or amended.

These points reflect key organizational strategy, something that will obviously have to be modified to what is appropriate in contemporary conditions.  Whatever forms of economic or armed struggle to a particular People’s War as well as organizational forms the Third World proletarian vanguards takes (whatever variations of democratic centralism, cell organizing, etc.) are their own duty to determine.  The only two things the Maoist-Third Worldists in the First World insist upon our Third World comrades is; a.) That the Third World proletariat be UNITED against the parasite First World, and b.)  That the Third World drop all illusions about economic “Western Progress” being the product of technology and bourgeois democracy, as well as a notion of a “proletariat” lying in wait in the First World, and the notorious “Theory of the Productive Forces” from which all these revisionist deviations from revolutionary theory have their root.

5. It is strictly forbidden to hold prisoners, either special prisoners (civilians) or soldiers; and the only time that should be spent in dealing with them is that which is absolutely necessary to demand funds (loans) of them; and whether these demands be successful or not, they shall be shot immediately, without any pretext.

6. Every stranger who shall be found armed and who cannot prove his right to carry arms, shall be summarily executed, regardless of race or nationality.

7. Every North American over 16 years of age shall be put to death, and only the aged men, the women, and children shall be respected. And on no account shall the traitors to our race be respected or spared.

As mentioned above, MR8 applies here.  “Heads are not leeks”, as Comrade Mao said.  “No quarter” is no longer applicable, either during an actual revolutionary GPW campaign or during JDPEN.  Following this, also no longer applicable are differentiations between Amerikkkan males of a certain age range and “the aged, the women” with the probable exception of the children.  EVERY Amerikkkan is going to have the chance to go to a certain required summer camp that never really ends (4), as all ages of majority and genders are have an “equal opportunity” to be parasites nowadays.  Comrade Serve the People’s teachings on the form of JDPEN in 2006 demonstrate the benefits of dispersing the First World parasite populations over the original ‘Plan de San Diego’s’ prescription.

8. The Apaches or Arizona, as well as the Indians (redskins) of the territory, shall be given every guarantee, and their lands which have been taken from them shall be returned to them, to the end that they may assist us in the cause which we defend.

10. The movement having gathered force, and once having possessed ourselves of the States above alluded to, we shall proclaim them an independent republic, later requesting, if it be thought expedient, annexation to Mexico without concerning ourselves at that time about the form of government which may control the destinies of the common mother country.

11. When we shall have obtained independence for the Negroes, we shall grant them a banner which they themselves shall be permitted to select, and we shall aid them in obtaining six States of the American Union, which States border upon those already mentioned, and they may from these six States from a republic, and they may therefore be independent.

15. It is understood among those who may follow this movement that we will carry as a singing voice the independence of the Negroes, placing obligations upon both races, and that on no account shall we accept aid, either moral or pecuniary, from the government of Mexico, and it need not consider itself under any obligations in this, our movement.

The response to these points in today’s context comes from the fountainhead of IJC’s JDPEN Programme, ‘Anti-Kolumbus Program for the Destruction of the White Nation’(5), issued by St. Patrick’s Battalion (SPB):

1. The White Nation (Amerika and Klanada) will be removed from all lands it occupies and abolished forever. The Dictatorship of the Proletariat of Exploited Nations will oversee the long term management of the imperialist nation populations.

2. Occupied land will be returned to the Mexican people. We support the national liberation, self-determination and socialist reunification for the Mexican people.

3. First Nations will have much of their historic land returned to them. We support their national liberation and self-determination.

4. Land will be given to the Black Nation, possibly in the Black Belt Lands as identified by the Comintern. We support national liberation and self-determination for the Black Nation.

5. National liberation and self-determination for all U$ colonies and neo-colonies.

6. Massive reparations from the imperialist nations to all peoples that they have exploited or oppressed.

The Third World global majority demanding justice be done to united $nakes’ internal parasite majority is not “the revenge line”, as crypto-Trotskyites of both the zombie and liberal variety assert.  By denying parasitism, the First Worldist fakes tell the Third World that it is WRONG to rebel!  Dispersing, reeducating, and extracting reparations from Amerikkkans are essential for the proletariat in overcoming all exploitation and oppression and realizing communism.  And now, with Maoism-Third Worldism, the Third World proletariat has the ideological tools necessary to give the trusty ole’ Jacobin guillotine a much needed break in the process of “de-Amerikkkanizing” the Amerikkkan sheeple.  Killing Amerikkkans ultimately isn’t the most decisive thing in People’s War… but resisting, defeating, and abolishing Amerikkka as a whole is.

How’s that for a 9/11 tribute?

Notes

1.  http://monkeysmashesheaven.wordpress.com/2009/09/05/mim-on-the-black-book-of-communism

2.  http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1930/03/02.htm

3.  http://www.rrojasdatabank.info/mao1.htm

4.  http://monkeysmashesheaven.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/the-form-of-the-joint-dictatorship-of-the-proletariat-of-oppressed-nations

5.  http://lossanpatricios.wordpress.com/our-program

From MSH: Dear Maoist-Third Worldist… Will First Worlders benefit from socialism?

(monkeysmashesheaven.wordpress.com)

Dear Maoist-Third Worldist,

Will First Worlders benefit at all from socialism?

Thank you for writing.

Socialism will lead to a lower-material standard of living for First World peoples. First World peoples earn many times more than the value of their labor. They earn many times more than an egalitarian, socialist distribution worldwide would entail. First World populations get more than their share of the pie. They live off the labor of the Third World. Under socialism, First World populations will have to give up their privileges, their lives of luxury, based on extracting super-profits from the Third World. The Joint Dictatorship of the Proletariat of Exploited Nations (JDPEN) will occupy and rule over the First World until First World populations can live as contributing members of global society. Here are some positive things that the JDPEN has to offer First Worlders:

1. Healthier lives. Even though socialism will entail a drop in the overall standard of living of peoples of the First World, in some ways life will improve for First World populations under socialism. With socialism, the capitalist food industries will not be free to control the diets of the population. First World peoples, generally, do not want for food. However, the food they consume can be extremely unhealthy. This is especially true of fast food and snacks. This has led to some of the highest obesity rates in the world being amongst First World populations. This situation won’t be allowed to exist under socialism. People will come before profits under socialism. Thus science will govern the dietary choices that people have available to them. In addition, socialism will encourage and may even require exercise as part of the work or school day. Time at work or at school may be allocated for an exercise regimen. In addition, people will receive health care under socialism. Health care should be considered a human right under socialism. Thus First World population, even though materially poorer, will generally lead healthier lives. A healthy population is a happier one.

2. Meaningful lives. Maoists in China thought that people could change. Maoists had a strong belief in people power. Under the Maoists, Chinese society was seen as a giant school of Maoism that had many elaborate practices that all aimed to educate and remold the entire population, both friends and enemies. These elaborate measures ran the range from criticism and self-criticism before the masses to Mao Zedong Thought teams and classes to labor and prison reform. In labor reform, people were sent to do hard work alongside the masses to be humbled and to learn. This was often the prescription for communist cadres who had acted as high-handed bureaucrats toward the people. Such cadres were sent to the countryside to be humbled, to learn of the plight of the masses, and to learn from them. This practice was an old one, it pre-dated the Cultural Revolution. It went at least back to the Great Leap Forward in the late 1950s. It was also practiced, with limited success, during campaigns such as the Socialist Education Movement prior to the Cultural Revolution. However, the Cultural Revolution raised this practice to new levels. An entire system of May 7th cadre schools were set up at the height of the Cultural Revolution as part of the process of rehabilitating and remolding cadres through labor. In addition, an entire generation of red guards was sent down to learn from the peasantry from 1968 onward. Many of these red guards would participate in the radical push to reestablish the collective economy of the countryside from 1968 to 1970. Just as those who needed to be humbled and reeducated were sent to the Chinese countryside, First Worlders too will be sent to the “global countryside,” the Third World, to do work for and alongside the truly oppressed. This process need not be one that is seen as punishment. Rather, this process will be one that ends the empty, decadent, and often boring and dreary lives of First Worlders. Instead, First Worlders will be sent on an adventure to reinvent themselves alongside the masses of the Third World. What is more exciting than self-reinvention and creating a whole new, just world? Capitalism limits the horizons of people, socialism will open First Worlders up to new possibilities. What is considered the good life should not be endless consumption, it should be a life of adventure, excitement, creativity, and doing good by humanity. Capitalism offers meaninglessness. Socialism offers meaning.

3. A future. The First World way of life is not sustainable. If First World populations continue to live as they do, then they will not only destroy themselves but also the entire planet. Socialism entails a more sustainable, balanced relationship between man and nature. Capitalism ensures a future that is an ecological hell. Socialism ensures that future generations will be happy and prosperous.

4. Peace. Capitalism is a system that has generated countless wars for profit. Many First World people die in these wars. The worst wars of this century were intra-imperialist wars, both World War 1 and 2 killed tens of millions, including many First World peoples. Socialism will guarantee that nobody will die in a war over profit. Nobody will die to maintain a class of parasites. Nobody will die in this senseless way. Socialism will provide peace from imperialist war.

Unfortunately, these benefits of socialism do not establish First World peoples as a social base for revolution. First World peoples are, and will continue to be, the most reactionary populations in the world for the time being. However, socialism is not about punishment, it is about liberation. However, we cannot let sentimentalism stand in our way from setting the world right. Let there be no mistake, liberation of humanity will entail the destruction of the First World way of life. In the end, in the long run, this will even be good for First World peoples themselves.

Review of ‘Overturning the Culture of Violence’

by Serve The People and End Imperialism

part 1 of ‘Overturning the Culture of Violence’ by the Uhuru Movement

part 2 of ‘Overturning the Culture of Violence’ by the Uhuru Movement

Overall, this video in two parts from the African People’s Socialist Party based in the U$ is excellent.  We have several major points of unity with APSP.  In particular, we strongly defend APSP’s insistence that the white working class is historically and up until today both a beneficiary and a vicious protagonist of Amerika’s system of white supremacy.

There are, however, three objectionable points made by the video.

Firstly, it is not true that all African people are one people everywhere on the planet.  People of African descent living within U$ borders (Blacks) are of a different nationality (a Black nation) than people living in, say, Mali, or even African, Haitian or Afro-Cuban migrants who come to live in the U$.

Secondly, Blacks are certainly an oppressed internal semi-colony (and not, as the video corectly states, merely victims of white racist ideology).  However, Blacks are no longer exploited; they are exploiters living off the imperialist pillage of the Third World.  The oppression they face is brutal and real, as are the extra profits (as distinct from surplus value) that U$ capitalism makes from their semi-colonial oppression.  Yet most Blacks are defenders of the United $tates’ society, economy and polity and are “white in outlook”, that is, they are exponents of much of the same chauvinistic oppressor ideology that jU$tifies Amerikan parasitism.  The APSP is certainly fighting an uphill battle trying to make revolutionary capital out of the national oppression of Blacks.

Thirdly, reparations are not an appropriate means of compensating Black people living in the U$ for the crimes of the system of slavery.  In general, no amount of money could redress some of the crimes of the imperialist nations, such as the outright extermination of some First Nations by the Amerikkkan settlers.  Money won’t bring those nations back from the grave.  Furthermore, the imperialist nations couldn’t possibly pay reparations for all that they have stolen over the past few centuries.  And even if they could, the transfer of wealth would create an imbalance that would itself be antithetical to socialism.  There have quite recently been greedy calls from Blacks for the united $nakes to make “reparations” for slavery in the form of a million-dollar check to each Black person.  That is nothing more than a very Amerikkkan something-for-nothingism.  If a small oppressed nation suddenly received reparations in the amount of millions of dollars per person, it would become part of a sort of “national aristocracy”.  From a strictly material point of view, the Black nation will be a debtor, not a creditor, when the time comes to right the inequalities among the various nations under the JDPEN.  To repeat: Black people living in the U$ have already been paid handsomely, particularly in the last half century, from the imperialist plunder of African, Asian and Latin American labor and resources.  Instead of calling for reparations (which nonetheless may have a certain agitational propaganda value) we should see to it that nations get what they need: land, food, infrastructure, schools, health care, linguistic and cultural rights, industry, mechanization, etc.  We can’t turn Kathmandu into Paris overnight, but we can arrange to improve things greatly.  We should see to it that Blacks living in Amerika receive the national territory that they are historically entitled to.

1.  http://blip.tv/file/484106

2.  http://blip.tv/file/390550

Outline Updated

Mirza Sultan-Galiyev was (to be) the founder of the “Colonial International”, but was shot for violations of democratic centralism in 1940

Guerrillero Heroico: The raw and original, uncommercialized, unglorified version of the iconic Ernesto “Che” Guevara photo

The JDPEN research project entry has been updated to reflect the rejection of a potential revisionist line in III., A., 3.

Also, we introduce  “D. Others glimpses of the JDPEN in history” with an exploration of  1. The Plan(s) of San Diego, 2. Mirza Sultan-Galiev and the proposed “Colonial International”,  3. Che Guevara’s “Many Vietnams” and Focoism.  “Where we go from here” is now moved to “E.”, which under “2. JDPEN being far more than ‘One Big Gulag’ ” contains the new bullets “a. Deportation of the First World Parasites tho the Third World for re-education” and “b. When does the reparations regime become a fetter the advance to communism under JDPEN?”.

NEW 6/12/2009:  III., A., 3. replaced as well as III., B., 1., c. being totally dropped.  These changes reflect what our research thus far indicates according to the Maoist-Third Worldist scientific method:  The problem with Soviet occupation was not that it was too mean, but that it was too nice to the German labor aristocracy.  That isn’t to say that there weren’t instances of anti-proletarian behavior amongst the Red Army at times, but to highlight it as some kind of fundamental flaw of the exploited’s exercise of dictatorship over the parasites tends to throw a blanket over the 27 MILLION Soviet peoples killed by Nazi Germany.  IJC has no use for bourgeois sensationalism clouding the issue here, thus the dropping of the whole entry.

These corrections and extra historical comparison help sharpen the political line of the Red Dawn draft programme.

El Alba Roja: El Nuevo Plan de San Diego

Ricardo and Enrique Flores Magon, Mexican revolutionaries and the inspiration of the original "Plan(s) of San Diego"

Red Dawn: The New Plan of San Diego is the working title of IJC’s Maoist-Third Worldist programme for the Joint Dictatorship of the Proletariat of the Exploited Nations (JDPEN) over u.$. imperialism, to be released in the coming weeks.  We will attempt to synthesize the original Plan(s) of San Diego (1915-1916) with the experience  of the Soviet occupation of Germany after World War II.  Imagine what could have been if Mexico had had the benefit of a Villa/Zapata led socialist state backing (assuming they were leaning proletarian) to the original Plan of San Diego.  Imagine what could have been if the Soviet Union kept on throwing its resources towards the exploited nations (via its own “Plan of San Diego” in Europe) and stopped trying to placate the former Nazi German labor aristocracy (and Europeans/Amerikans in general) in the post-Stalin era .   Imagine what could have been… and imagine what will be!

Therefore, let us think about what is to be done now!

The Soviet Occupation of Nazi Germany and the JDPEN

Here, following Soviet Victory Day, IJC puts forward an outline on the information on this unique experience in the history of class struggle as a potential building block for JDPEN.  We give: 1.) An overview of the history (1945-1953 mostly, with a post-script), 2.) an analysis of what worked and what went wrong, 3.) and a Maoist-Third Worldist synthesis of this history with the programme of the JDPEN (see Lin Biao’s LLVPW!).  We will also be reviewing The Russians in Germany by bourgeois historian Norman Naimark.

[Formatting/indentation fixed, test version link now here].

I.  Background of the occupation of Germany

A.  Soviet plans before capture of Berlin

B.  The “Allied Occupations Zones”

C.  Contradictions with and pressure points from Western imperialism

II.  Background of German war reparations to the Soviet Union

A.  [$10 billion was] “minimum compensation”

B.  The expropriation of German wealth and productive forces back to the Soviet Union

C.  Pressure points and contradictions of reparations

1.  Western imperialism

2.  Lack of consistent proletarian leadership by the Soviets

3.  The lingering German labor aristocracy

III.  A synthesis of this history and the Joint Dictatorship of the Proletariat

A.  Lack of data on the form of JDPEN thus far

1.  MTWist movement still working on hard figures of exploitation

2.  Crypto-Trotskyite obfuscation of exploitation

3.  “Reproletariatization”, and old-school Leninism goes halfway there

B.  Problems with the early DDR model (1945-1953)

1.  Socialist Unity Party’s (SEP) problems

a.  Mushy collaboration of SPD and KPD

b.  Seeds of revisionism in the leadership of Walter Ulbricht

2.  The labor aristocracy influence and the reverse of reparations post-Stalin

C.  Lin Biao’s conception of Global People’s War (GPW)

1.  How Mao’s concept of the Broad United Front Against Imperialism (BUFAI) ties into GPW

2.  The fallacy of “reproletarising” labor aristocrats absent Third world invasion/occupation

a.  RCP=CIA: “The Amerikkkan Middle Class just has a longer fuse, that’s all!”

b.  Lin Biao’s errors

c.  MIM’s errors

D.  Others glimpses of the JDPEN in history

1. The Plan(s) of San Diego

2. Mirza Sultan-Galiev and the proposed “Colonial International”

3. Che Guevara’s “Many Vietnams” and Focoism

E.  Where we go from here

1.  Making First world reparations to Third world PERMANENT JUSTICE

2.  JDPEN being far more than “One Big Gulag”

a. Deportation of the First World Parasites tho the Third World for re-education

b. When does the reparations regime become a fetter the advance to communism under JDPEN?

3.  The ever-increasing necessity of Maoist Cultural Revolution during JDPEN

a.  To prevent First world parasite superstructural culture form taking hold

b.  To continue to blaze trails towards a Communist future

We will be releasing the body of this research and the book review shortly.  Any others sources comrades might find helpful to this project, please contact us with that info.

Our Love for the Planet and the People in it is Why We Hate Amerikkka!

The Internationalist Jacobin Club is here, and its task as an independent cell is to develop a programme for the Joint Dictatorship of the Proletariat of the Exploited Nations (JDPEN) over the united $nakes.  This blog will feature global news and analysis towards this effort.  The Internationalist Jacobin Club upholds Maoism-Third Worldism (see “About IJC“).  Readers (supporters, those on the fence, and critics) are encouraged to comment using anonymous reasoning while avoiding logical fallacies and pig information.

Chen Boda’s Famous Quote of Lenin on Proletarian Jacobinism (many thanks to MSH):

“The Jacobins of contemporary Social-Democracy — the Bolsheviks, the Vperyodovtsi, Syezdovtsi, Proletartsi, or whatever we may call them — wish by their slogans to raise the revolutionary and republican petty bourgeoisie, and especially the peasantry, to the level of the consistent democratic centralism of the proletariat, which fully retains its individuality as a class. They want the people, i.e. the proletariat and the peasantry, to settle accounts with the monarchy and the aristocracy in the ‘plebeian way,’ ruthlessly destroying the enemies of liberty, crushing their resistance by force, making no concessions whatever to the accursed heritage of serfdom, of Asiatic barbarism and human degradation.”

Too bad for the labor aristoracy… we will resolutely smash their privileges to dust.  And into the dustbin of history with them!

Soviet Victory Day

Tonight, 64 years ago this evening, the Red Flag was hoisted over the Reichstag, signifying the first victorious proletarian invasion of imperialism.

The Internationalist Jacobin Club salutes the enormous sacrifices made by the Soviet People and the United Front against Fascism for the world’s oppressed.  We at IJC have alot to live up to in this example.

Our first official heralding statement is hours away…