This article is in part a response to a comment by Serve the People in the JDPEN Outline post. The comment reads:
Comrade, I agree that things were not perfect in occupied eastern Germoney. I’m not convinced that that part of Germoney ever quite made it to socialism. On the other hand, proletarianizing that fascist population was a task of monumental proportions. I don’t believe that it could have been achieved in the short few years before the Soviet Union itself went revisionist. Proletarianizing a thoroughly reactionary population like Germoney or Amerikkka may take several generations.
I’m not quite sure what you mean by a Soviet version of the Plans of San Diego. Are you saying that the Soviet Red Army should have killed off all Germans?
The short answer is NO. The same goes for the JDPEN’s settling of accounts with the other First World parasite majority populations. Just imagine the shit fit we communists would be getting into if we were ever to advocate mass killings of any group of humans, oppressors and net exploiters included! Fortunately, communists (Maoist-Third Worldists) are humanitarians in the fullest sense. We do not, and I repeat, DO NOT believe in the democide of the class enemy, whether during initial revolution or JDPEN, because we insist on acting in a scientific and strategic way as we move towards communism rather than acting on vengeful bloodlusts. This in opposition to fake “Maoists” calling reparations, GPW, and JDPEN as manifestations of the “revenge line”, which they do to backhandedly deny the principal contradiction between First World and Third World.
The anti-communist academics (1) like to point out the grim fates of those “Enemies of the People” under Stalin and Mao as evidence of this so-called “inherent bloodlust” among the communists and their leadership. Their bourgeois-idealist accounts leave out all the material facts and contradictions of that period and read as though no world existed outside of these so-called “totalitarian” socialist states, the Soviet Union (pre-1950’s) and China (early 70’s). The actual historical record disputes their “scholarly” accounts. Comrade Stalin wrote ‘Dizzy With Success’ (2) to put the breaks on excesses taking place in the struggle for the Soviet Union’s agriculture collectivization in the 1930’s. Stalin also had Nikolai Yezhov (head of the NKVD) shot for executing and imprisoning many innocent people in the late 1930’s.
Comrade Mao explains in ‘Ten Major Relationships’ (3) under the eighth “major relationship” point (ref. as “MR8″) not only the ethical and security issues around executions but also the science behind it. KKKasama omits large portions of MR8 and follows up with a liberal, idealist discussion of the “horrific” exercise of proletarian state power, borrowing very much from the paradigm and methods of the anti-communist academics mentioned above! In contrast, the full context of what Mao said in MR8 says that communists should always be vigilant against counter-revolutionaries, and some of the worst enemies of the people will most certainly be executed. However, Comrade Mao puts forward the notion that enemies can be reformed into “new people”, and that the policy of reform of class enemies through labor be the general policy as opposed to executions.
Observe Mao’s analysis of the eighth “Major Relationship” in full context here:
8.- The relationship between revolutionary and counter-revolutionary
What kind of element is a counter-revolutionary element? It is a negative element, a destructive element. It is not a positive element. It is a force opposed to positive elements. Can a negative element turn into a positive element? Can a destructive element turn into a beneficial element? Can a counter-revolutionary change? This depends on social conditions. Completely stubborn, dyed-in-the-wool counter-revolutionaries undoubtedly exist. But where the majority of them are concerned, given our social conditions, the day may come when they do change. Of course, there are some who will not have time to change before they are summoned by the King of Hell. And, as for some others, who knows when they will change? Because of the people's strength, and because of our correct policy towards counter-revolutionary elements of allowing them to reform themselves through labor and become new people, there have been many counter-revolutionaries who have given up being counter-revolutionary. They have taken part in agricultural and industrial labor; some of them have become very active and done useful work. There are a number of points about the work of suppressing counter- revolution which need affirmation. For instance, should we have carried out the suppression of counter-revolution of 1951-52? It seems that some hold that we should not have carried this out. This view is wrong. It must be recognized that this campaign was necessary. The methods of handling counter-revolutionaries are execution, imprisonment, probation and release. Everybody knows what execution is. Imprisonment means locking people up and allowing them to reform themselves through labour. Probation means placing them in society to be supervised and remoulded by the masses. Release means not arresting those who might or might not be arrested, or releasing those who behave well after arrest. It is altogether right that we give different kinds of counter-revolutionary elements different treatment according to circumstances. These methods all need to be explained carefully to the common people. Whom have we executed? What sort of people? Elements for whom the masses had great hatred, and whose blood-debt was heavy. In a great revolution of 600 million people, if we did not kill some tyrants, or if we were too lenient to them, the masses would not agree. It is still of practical significance to affirm that it was correct to execute these people. Not to give that affirmation would be bad. This is the first point. The second point needing affirmation is that counter-revolutionary elements still exist in society, though there are now far fewer of them. Our social discipline is very good, but we still should not relax our vigilance. To say that not one counter-revolutionary remains and then sit back and take things easy would be wrong. There is still a small number of counter-revolutionaries carrying out sabotage; for example, killing cattle, burning grain, wrecking factories, stealing information, peddling counter-revolutionary slogans, etc. In future, in suppressing counter-revolution in our society we must make fewer arrests and carry out fewer executions. We should hand the majority of counter-revolutionaries over to the agricultural cooperatives so that they may participate in productive work under supervision, and be transformed through labor. But we should not declare that we shall never execute anyone. We cannot abolish the death penalty. If a counter-revolutionary were to commit murder or to blow up a factory, do you think he should be executed? He most definitely should. The third point which should be affirmed concerns the work of suppressing counter-revolutionaries in government offices, schools and the army. We must keep up the policy which we started in Yenan: "No executions and few arrests". There are some whom we do not execute, not because they have done nothing to deserve death, but because killing them would bring no advantage, whereas sparing their lives would. What harm is there in not executing people? Those amenable to labor reform should go and do labor reform, so that rubbish can be transformed in something useful. Besides, people's heads are not like leeks. When you cut them off, they will not grow again. If you cut off a head wrongly, there is no way of rectifying the mistake even if you want to. If government departments were to adopt a policy of no executions in their work of suppressing counter-revolutionaries, this still would not prevent us from taking counter-revolution seriously. Moreover it would ensure that we would not make mistakes, or if we did they could be corrected. This would calm many people. If we do not execute people, we must feed them. So we should give all counter-revolutionaries way out of their impasse. This will be helpful to the people's cause and to our image abroad. The suppression of counter-revolution still requires a long period of hard work. None of us may relax our efforts.
IJC sees no reason why Comrade Mao’s observation cannot apply today, even when dealing with Amerikkkan counter-revolutionary “mASSes”. These anti-communist academics always claim that Comrade Stalin’s call to “liquidate the kulaks as a class” was about democide. Wrong. Stalin was talking about liquidating CLASSES, not physical human beings as a matter of policy. This is not to say violations of human rights and other excesses never occurred under proletarian watch, but the key to the goals of the communists is the abolition of classes not “Kill all the white people and then we’ll be free” or such simplistic vengeful nonsense, however deserving Amerikkkans might be. Naturally, it follows that some classes, namely the exploiter and oppressor classes, will disappear before the exploited and oppressed classes disappear in the course of losing their privileges in the socialist regime (the JDPEN) that precedes totally classless, global communism. It also follows that the role of revolutionary violence is an unpleasant, unfortunate necessity. (With regards the new bourgeoisie that inevitably arises under any socialist regime, that class of sellouts will also disappear well before the proletariat and peasantry do, to be followed by the withering away of all class distinctions globally.)
The longer answer would be to go point by point through the original ‘Plan de San Diego’ applying the method used by Comrade Mao in MR8, as well as a contemporary Maoist-Third Worldist analysis on various points. We will demonstrate that the original ‘Plan de San Diego’ is a document whose literal prescriptions (especially the no quarter policy) have largely passed their relevant time. We will do this while keeping in mind that Amerikkkans are no less guilty today of benefiting from imperialist war and plunder that kills millions globally every year than in the decades surrounding 1915, when lynchings of exploited and oppressed peoples (Mexicanos, the First Nations, the Black Nation and the Asian Nations) were happening on a daily basis by Amerikkkan hands. Add to this the birth of u.$. Imperialism (in the Leninist sense) with the occupation of the Philippines and Cuba after the $panish-Amerikkkan War. Here are the original 15 points of ‘El Plan de San Diego’ grouped by relevant subject matter:
1. On the 20th day of February, 1915, at 2 o’clock in the morning, we will rise in arms against the Government and country of the united States and North America, on as all and all as one, proclaiming the liberty of the individuals of the black race and its independence and segregation of the States bordering on the Mexican nation, which are: Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, and Upper California, of which States the Republic of Mexico was robbed in a most perfidious manner by North American imperialism.
Genuine anti-imperialists uphold the proclamation of this first point in the main.
2. In order to render the foregoing clause effective, the necessary army corps will be formed under the immediate command of military leaders named by the supreme revolutionary congress of San Diego, Texas, which shall have full power to designate a supreme chief who shall be at the head of said army. The banner which shall guide us in this enterprise shall be red, with a white diagonal fringe, and bearing the following inscription: “Equality and Independence,” and none of the subordinate leaders or subalterns shall use any other flag (except only the white for signals.) The aforesaid army shall be known by the name of “Liberating Army for Races and Peoples.”
3. Each one of the chiefs will do his utmost by whatever means possible, to get possession of the arms and funds of the cities which he has beforehand been designated to capture in order that our cause may be provided with resources to continue the fight with better success, the said leaders each being required to render an account of everything to his superiors, in order that the latter may dispose of it in the proper manner.
4. The leader who may take a city must immediately name and appoint municipal authorities, in order that they may preserve order and assist in every way possible the revolutionary movement. In case the capital of any State which we are endeavoring to liberate be captured, there will be named in the same manner superior municipal authorities for the same purpose.
9. All appointments and grades in our army which are exercised by subordinate officers (subalterns) shall be examined (recognized) by the superior officers. There shall likewise be recognized the grades of leaders of other comlplots which may not be connected with this, and who may wise to co-operate with us – also those who may affiliate with us later.
12. None of the leaders shall have the power to make terms with the enemy without first communicating with the superior officers of the army, bearing in mind that this is a war without quarter, nor shall any leader enroll in his ranks any stranger unless said stranger belongs to the Latin, the Negro, or the Japanese race.
13. It is understood that none of the members of this complit (or anyone who may come in later) shall upon the definite triumph of the cause which we defend, fail to recognize their superiors, nor shall they aid others who with bastard designs may endeavor to destroy what has been accomplished with such great work.
14. As soon as possible each local society (junta) shall nominate delegates, who shall meet at a time and place beforehand designated, for the purpose of nominating a permanent directorate of the revolutionary movement. At this meeting shall be determined and worked out in detail the power and duties of the permanent directorate, and this revolutionary plan may be revised or amended.
These points reflect key organizational strategy, something that will obviously have to be modified to what is appropriate in contemporary conditions. Whatever forms of economic or armed struggle to a particular People’s War as well as organizational forms the Third World proletarian vanguards takes (whatever variations of democratic centralism, cell organizing, etc.) are their own duty to determine. The only two things the Maoist-Third Worldists in the First World insist upon our Third World comrades is; a.) That the Third World proletariat be UNITED against the parasite First World, and b.) That the Third World drop all illusions about economic “Western Progress” being the product of technology and bourgeois democracy, as well as a notion of a “proletariat” lying in wait in the First World, and the notorious “Theory of the Productive Forces” from which all these revisionist deviations from revolutionary theory have their root.
5. It is strictly forbidden to hold prisoners, either special prisoners (civilians) or soldiers; and the only time that should be spent in dealing with them is that which is absolutely necessary to demand funds (loans) of them; and whether these demands be successful or not, they shall be shot immediately, without any pretext.
6. Every stranger who shall be found armed and who cannot prove his right to carry arms, shall be summarily executed, regardless of race or nationality.
7. Every North American over 16 years of age shall be put to death, and only the aged men, the women, and children shall be respected. And on no account shall the traitors to our race be respected or spared.
As mentioned above, MR8 applies here. “Heads are not leeks”, as Comrade Mao said. “No quarter” is no longer applicable, either during an actual revolutionary GPW campaign or during JDPEN. Following this, also no longer applicable are differentiations between Amerikkkan males of a certain age range and “the aged, the women” with the probable exception of the children. EVERY Amerikkkan is going to have the chance to go to a certain required summer camp that never really ends (4), as all ages of majority and genders are have an “equal opportunity” to be parasites nowadays. Comrade Serve the People’s teachings on the form of JDPEN in 2006 demonstrate the benefits of dispersing the First World parasite populations over the original ‘Plan de San Diego’s’ prescription.
8. The Apaches or Arizona, as well as the Indians (redskins) of the territory, shall be given every guarantee, and their lands which have been taken from them shall be returned to them, to the end that they may assist us in the cause which we defend.
10. The movement having gathered force, and once having possessed ourselves of the States above alluded to, we shall proclaim them an independent republic, later requesting, if it be thought expedient, annexation to Mexico without concerning ourselves at that time about the form of government which may control the destinies of the common mother country.
11. When we shall have obtained independence for the Negroes, we shall grant them a banner which they themselves shall be permitted to select, and we shall aid them in obtaining six States of the American Union, which States border upon those already mentioned, and they may from these six States from a republic, and they may therefore be independent.
15. It is understood among those who may follow this movement that we will carry as a singing voice the independence of the Negroes, placing obligations upon both races, and that on no account shall we accept aid, either moral or pecuniary, from the government of Mexico, and it need not consider itself under any obligations in this, our movement.
The response to these points in today’s context comes from the fountainhead of IJC’s JDPEN Programme, ‘Anti-Kolumbus Program for the Destruction of the White Nation’(5), issued by St. Patrick’s Battalion (SPB):
1. The White Nation (Amerika and Klanada) will be removed from all lands it occupies and abolished forever. The Dictatorship of the Proletariat of Exploited Nations will oversee the long term management of the imperialist nation populations.
2. Occupied land will be returned to the Mexican people. We support the national liberation, self-determination and socialist reunification for the Mexican people.
3. First Nations will have much of their historic land returned to them. We support their national liberation and self-determination.
4. Land will be given to the Black Nation, possibly in the Black Belt Lands as identified by the Comintern. We support national liberation and self-determination for the Black Nation.
5. National liberation and self-determination for all U$ colonies and neo-colonies.
6. Massive reparations from the imperialist nations to all peoples that they have exploited or oppressed.
The Third World global majority demanding justice be done to united $nakes’ internal parasite majority is not “the revenge line”, as crypto-Trotskyites of both the zombie and liberal variety assert. By denying parasitism, the First Worldist fakes tell the Third World that it is WRONG to rebel! Dispersing, reeducating, and extracting reparations from Amerikkkans are essential for the proletariat in overcoming all exploitation and oppression and realizing communism. And now, with Maoism-Third Worldism, the Third World proletariat has the ideological tools necessary to give the trusty ole’ Jacobin guillotine a much needed break in the process of “de-Amerikkkanizing” the Amerikkkan sheeple. Killing Amerikkkans ultimately isn’t the most decisive thing in People’s War… but resisting, defeating, and abolishing Amerikkka as a whole is.
How’s that for a 9/11 tribute?
Notes
1. http://monkeysmashesheaven.wordpress.com/2009/09/05/mim-on-the-black-book-of-communism
2. http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1930/03/02.htm
3. http://www.rrojasdatabank.info/mao1.htm
4. http://monkeysmashesheaven.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/the-form-of-the-joint-dictatorship-of-the-proletariat-of-oppressed-nations
5. http://lossanpatricios.wordpress.com/our-program
RSS - Posts
